We earn a commission when you buy through some links on this site. Commissions never change our scores or rankings. How we make money

Best VPS Match › About

About Best VPS Match

An independent VPS comparison site. We earn commissions on some links, and commissions never change our scores or rankings. Scores based on public data.

About this site

We built Best VPS Match because we were tired of VPS comparison sites that rank whoever pays the highest affiliate commission. Every major comparison site in this space has strong financial incentives to push you toward whichever provider gives them 30–50% recurring commission — regardless of fit. We wanted a site that just scores providers honestly on what matters and tells you who's right for which use case.

What this site is

Best VPS Match scores 16 VPS providers across 8 weighted factors using publicly available, independently verifiable data. Scores are editorial — based on provider documentation, published SLAs, and independent benchmark reports — not first-person lab tests. The methodology page documents every factor, its weight, and what data sources we use.

What this site is not

Revenue model

Best VPS Match earns a commission on some provider links (Kamatera, UpCloud, Hostwinds, DigitalOcean, and ScalaHosting, plus VPSServer, which has no scored listing and is linked from the ethics page). The Visit buttons on this page are those affiliate links.

Other outbound links go to official provider homepages. Current partners are listed on the ethics page. Affiliate relationships never affect our scoring or recommendations.

Corrections and updates

If you spot a pricing error, a broken source link, or a score that looks wrong given publicly available data — please use the contact page. We verify and update records periodically, but provider pricing and features change frequently. The dataLastVerified date on the homepage reflects the last full data review.

Related site

Best VPS Match is a sibling project to bestvpnmatch.com — an independent VPN comparison using the same editorial model.