We earn a commission when you buy through some links on this site. Commissions never change our scores or rankings. How we make money

Best VPS Match › Vultr vs Hetzner
Head-to-Head Comparison 2026

Vultr vs Hetzner 2026

Updated June 2026 · Independent editorial

Vultr scores 89/100 and Hetzner 87/100 on our editorial model — but for very different reasons. Vultr's strength is global reach, GPU instances, and a larger product ecosystem. Hetzner's strength is European value, GDPR jurisdiction, and strong price-per-CPU. Here's exactly how they compare.

The Kamatera, UpCloud and DigitalOcean Visit buttons are affiliate links (rel="sponsored nofollow noopener"). Best VPS Match earns a commission if you buy through them. Scores and rankings are editorial and unchanged by this relationship. Other Visit buttons on this page go to official homepages. Sitewide affiliateActive remains false. See /ethics.

Verdict at a Glance

Vultr
89/100
From $2.50/mo · 32 global locations
  • 32 data centres — widest global coverage
  • GPU cloud instances (A100/H100)
  • Managed Kubernetes + databases
  • High-frequency CPU tier (3.8GHz+)
  • First deposit matched up to $100 for new accounts
Hetzner
87/100
From $3.29/mo · Germany, Finland, US-East
  • ~60% cheaper per vCPU than Vultr
  • EU/German jurisdiction — GDPR-native
  • Outside US CLOUD Act
  • NVMe on all plans
  • Best for European self-hosters

Round-by-Round

PriceHetzner wins
Vultr (Standard)
$12/mo
2 vCPU · 4GB RAM · 80GB NVMe · 3TB transfer
Hetzner
€4.35/mo (~$4.70)
2 vCPU · 4GB RAM · 40GB NVMe · 20TB transfer
Hetzner is roughly 60% cheaper per vCPU. The savings are significant at scale — a 3-node k3s cluster on Hetzner (€15/mo) vs Vultr standard (~$36/mo) with similar specs. Vultr's bandwidth allowance is better per-server but Hetzner includes 20TB which is more than enough for most workloads.
Global CoverageVultr wins
Vultr
32 locations
US (8), Europe (7), Asia Pacific (9), South America, Middle East, Africa
Hetzner
5 locations
Germany ×2, Finland, US-East ×2 — no Asia, no LatAm
Vultr's geographic coverage is unmatched at this price tier — 32 locations including Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney, São Paulo, and Johannesburg. Hetzner is purely EU + US-East. For global applications needing low-latency across continents, Vultr is the only option of the two.
Privacy & JurisdictionHetzner wins
Hetzner is German-incorporated and operates under EU law. Not subject to the US CLOUD Act. Can sign GDPR Data Processing Agreements. Ideal for EU businesses or any company wanting to minimise US government data access. Vultr is US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act regardless of server location — including their Frankfurt servers.
GPU & Specialised ComputeVultr wins
Vultr offers GPU Cloud instances including NVIDIA A100 and H100 options — the same hardware behind many commercial AI services. Essential for local LLM inference, AI training, or GPU-accelerated rendering. Hetzner has no GPU VPS offering (though their dedicated servers include GPU options for different workloads). For AI, ML, or GPU compute: Vultr is the clear choice.
Developer EcosystemVultr wins
Vultr has invested heavily in managed services: Managed Kubernetes (VKE), Managed Databases (Postgres/MySQL/Redis), Object Storage, CDN, and Load Balancers. Official Terraform and Pulumi providers. Their High Frequency CPU tier (3.8GHz+ AMD EPYC) is unique in this price bracket. Hetzner offers raw VPS, load balancers, and object storage — but no managed Kubernetes or managed databases.
Overall ScoreVultr edges ahead
Vultr
89/100
Wins: Global reach, GPU, managed services, high-frequency CPU
Hetzner
87/100
Wins: Price, EU jurisdiction, bandwidth, privacy

Who Should Choose Each?

Choose Vultr if...
  • You need presence in Asia Pacific, LatAm, or Middle East
  • You're running GPU workloads or AI inference
  • You want managed Kubernetes or managed databases
  • You need the highest single-core CPU speed (High Frequency tier)
  • You're deploying globally distributed microservices
  • You want Windows Server instances
Choose Hetzner if...
  • Your users are in Europe
  • Price is the primary constraint
  • EU data residency or GDPR compliance is required
  • You're self-hosting or running CI/CD runners
  • You want to avoid US CLOUD Act exposure
  • You're running multiple nodes and cost adds up quickly

Price at Key Spec Points

Specs Vultr (Standard) Hetzner Hetzner saves
1 vCPU · 1GB RAM$2.50/mo€3.29/moVultr cheaper here
1 vCPU · 2GB RAM$6.00/mo€3.29/mo~45%
2 vCPU · 4GB RAM$12.00/mo€4.35/mo~64%
4 vCPU · 8GB RAM$24.00/mo€7.58/mo~68%
8 vCPU · 16GB RAM$48.00/mo€14.39/mo~70%

Prices as of June 2026. Vultr Standard tier vs Hetzner CX series. Vultr High Frequency tier (higher clock speed) costs approximately 20% more than Standard.

Alternative to both

Kamatera
84/100
Also scored · from $4/mo · unmanaged · 21 locations · root yes

Kamatera scores 84/100 in vps-comparison-2026.json. Best for a flexible, fully configurable cloud across 21 locations. This box does not change the Vultr vs Hetzner comparison above.

The Kamatera Visit button on this page is an affiliate link. We earn a commission if you buy through it. Scores and rankings are editorial and unchanged by this relationship. See ethics.
Visit Kamatera →

Frequently Asked Questions

For raw CPU performance: Vultr's High Frequency tier (3.8GHz+ AMD EPYC) outperforms Hetzner's standard shared vCPU plans. For storage: both use NVMe SSD and perform comparably. For network latency within Europe: Hetzner's Frankfurt and Falkenstein data centres perform similarly to Vultr Frankfurt. For Asia Pacific or US West: Vultr wins because Hetzner doesn't have those regions.
Yes — many developers use Hetzner for European compute (where the savings are largest) and Vultr for Asia Pacific or US West coast presence. Both have Terraform providers, so multi-provider IaC is straightforward. Using Cloudflare or Fastly as a CDN in front of both makes this even simpler.
No — Hetzner does not offer a managed Kubernetes service. The popular workaround is k3s (lightweight Kubernetes) self-installed on Hetzner VPS nodes using Terraform + Ansible. The Hetzner Cloud Controller Manager (CCM) integrates k8s with Hetzner Load Balancers and Volumes. It's more work to set up than DigitalOcean DOKS or Vultr VKE, but significantly cheaper for the same cluster specs.
Depends on your users and team. For EU-focused startups with a technical team: Hetzner gives maximum compute budget. For global startups or those without DevOps resource: Vultr's managed services remove operational overhead that's valuable early. Vultr's first-deposit match (up to $100 for new accounts) also extends your runway. If you're purely cost-optimising and your users are in Europe: Hetzner wins by a significant margin.
Still deciding? Take the VPS match quiz.
Answer 3 questions and get a personalised recommendation across all 16 providers.
Find my VPS →

See Also

Hetzner vs DigitalOcean · UpCloud vs Hetzner · Kamatera vs Vultr · Best VPS for AI Agents

Visit Kamatera →Visit UpCloud →Visit DigitalOcean →